질문의 모든 부분에 답변을하는 방법

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edLuMiCUzlQ&ab_channel=LilieIELTS 

 

Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.

어떤거에 동의하냐?

 

to what extent?  얼마나 동의하냐? 이런거

 

I completely/ totally agree 이런거?

 

1.Use completely or totally to respond to what extent

 

2.fully understand question

(respond in a way that demonstrates that we understand that there are

different types of railways and roads)

이유들자면.such as subways and high why railways are more important thatn roads.

 

 

railway보고 railway만 생각하지말고 동의어 짜내라

subways, high-speed rail networks, tram lines, international trains 등등

 

roads:

streets, highways, country roads.

 

모두 다 이야기할거임. type들.

 

3. Do not ignore the thing you disagree with

governments should spend money or railways.

To what extent do you agree or disagree 이런 질문이아님

 

도로에 대해서도 이야기해줘야됨 너가 railway가 더 중요하다고 하더라도?

(compare the thing you agree with, with the thing you disagree with)

 

BP1- Encourage green travel?

Funding railways encourages green travel.?

Improving roads may result in an increase in car use

However, if governments build more subway or tram lines to make it

easier for people to take them to get around, more people will

choose them rather than private cars as their major means of travel.

roads-> more car use

railways -> more train use

This is good for environment because subway and tram trains have a much

larger capacity and therefore much lower per-capita carbon emissions

than private vehicles.

 

BP2 -Economic activity

Railway networks are crucial for economic activity. This is because

with these networks connecting different cities and even countries,

goods can be shipped fast and cost-effectively. (Take for example,

the China-Europe railway express. In july this year, it transported roguhtly

150,00 containers carrying everyday items to Euripe. 등등 뭐

레노버 컴퓨터 옮겼다느니 이런거 좋은 예시가아님 partially relevant한거임)

(중요한건 fast and cost-effectively임)

Take, for example, the China-Europe Railway express, which moves

cargo containers from China to London in only 18 to 19 days.

This is roughly half the transit time of an ocean container, and the cost

is around ten times cheaper than making use of air frieght. This means

that goods can be delivered in time with relatively low costs from source

to consumption for Black Fridays or for any other promotional activities that

take place in the UK.Although road transport is also cost effective,

it cannot provide the speed that railway transport does

 

 

Introduction.

-paraphrase spend money on -> invest money in

rather tahn -> instead of

give opinion

state two main ideas(green travel, economic activities kind of thing)

(경제활동이 commercial activity나 business activity 가 되선안됌)

 

It is argued that governments should invest money in railways instead of roads.

I completely agree with this point of view because railways are more environmentally

friendly and also play a key role in economic activity

 

 

Conclusion 

restate your opinion

restate the main 2 ideas

 

In conclusion, government spending should be on railways rather than roads.

For one thing, better railway services encourage eco-friendly travel and,

for another, they play a big aprt in economic activity.